Different interpretation of dunkirk

Such prognostications seemed confirmed in 30 May, with the publication of a telegram from the king to Lord Gort, which could be read as a message of farewell.

She will go sailing down the years in the epic of Dunkirk. But it might influence the kinds of questions they ask, the themes and subjects which hold their attention and the philosophical and political modes of analysis they bring to bear on the problems they study.

The hearts of everyone of us at home are with you and your magnificent troops in this hour of peril. Sources A, B and C show that the Allies had been defencelessly at the mercy of the Germans, and had had no hope of claiming a military victory at the time.

Stories of the Battle of Britain 1940 – Dunkirk Over: Triumph or Defeat?

And the Gods have no part to play at all. John Shaw examines why historians are prone to disagreements about the past The reasons why historians disagree are many and varied, but the following represent some of them: This is shown by Source E — a newspaper report that depicts the evacuated soldiers as heroic and unbeatable.

The context in which evidence is interpreted These disagreements do not happen in a refined atmosphere of pure debate, far removed from the influences of the contemporary world.

They were a difficult people to feed on lies, but they were perfectly happy to lie to themselves, particularly when that lie held the key to their survival as a nation. The Times editorial, the 'Sea Grip', a peon to British maritime prowess, was followed by 'Anabasis - the Sea', which drew a parallel between Gort and the BEF, and Xenophon and the escape of the 10, Moreover, the narratives they produce are simply that: A positive summation of some of these trends can be found in Rethinking History by Keith Jenkins.

Thucydides would have none of this. Top The people and the media Sixty years ago there were three main ways of receiving information. They had to be flexible, and adopt different positions to accommodate ever changing circumstances. Print this page Bad news Over the last ten years new terms have entered the English language.

We also saw the armada of great and little ships, by means of which the British were evacuating their forces. And Interpretation is a communication process, designed to reveal meanings and relationships of our cultural and natural heritage, through involvement with objects, artefacts, landscapes and sites.

Although documentation in the form of cabinet minutes is sparse, the campaign that emerged can be pieced together from newspapers and recordings and transcripts of radio programmes.

The meaning of Dunkirk

It was a very British story - the gallant loser escaping from disaster at the very last moment - and one that the public liked to be told.

The Dunkirkers briefly lost their home port when the city was conquered by the French in but Spanish forces recaptured the city in All three sources point towards the Battle of Dunkirk being a losing fight. This revision was soon challenged by historians like Berg and Hudson who questioned the data but also contested the approach to the data that Crafts and Harley had adopted.

The Histories of Herodotus attempt to explain the causes and course of the great war between the Greeks and the Persians but Different interpretation of dunkirk do much more than this. The soldiers and army co-ordinaters saw it on the other hand as a defeat and disaster.

Shame-as we went back through those white-faced, silent crowds of Belgians, the people who had cheered us and waved to us as we came through their country only four days before, people who had vivid memories of a previous German occupation and whom we were now handing over to yet another.

Finally, virtually all British households subscribed to a weekly paper or magazine, while the collective circulation of daily newspapers showed that the British market had reached saturation point.

Using rifles to try to shoot down planes was ridiculous — the chance of them causing any damage with such small guns was incredibly small. Up until the s and s interpretations of the industrial revolution suggested a period of dramatic economic growth in the later eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries - in part based on data relating to the wages of craftsmen compiled during the s and s by Phelps-Brown and Hopkins.

Churchill first learned of the full extent of the disaster that had overwhelmed the French at Sedan, when he flew to Paris for a meeting with the French government on 16 May, and found them in a state of near panic. They have not come back in triumph, they have come back in glory.

As the Will of God is in Heaven, even so let Him do. Hundreds of such craft had indeed been co-opted, and had sailed across the Channel, but most had naval reserve crews, and had been used for ferrying men from the beaches to the destroyers.

Everyone seemed hilarious — you would imagine that the evacuation of France, still proceeding, spelt victory, not defeat. Newspapers and books coming out at the time were telling people of how well we had done.

It does make us realise that there were many men who were not involved in defending the port town, and that the focus was not on fighting the Germans back but, instead, on getting everyone out. This tells us that brooman saw Dunkirk ad defeat.

There are two interpretation of Dunkirk because of nationality, use of propaganda, media and their experience of Dunkirk. At first it seemed that the prayers might not be answered. Holding positions such as this was key to the defence of the port in order to provide extra time for ships to arrive for evacuation.

We were just so demoralised and humiliated. Updated Friday 13th May Hindsight is, supposedly, perfect - and yet history is a deeply controversial subject. In this essay I will be viewing and analysing two different interpretations of the events that took place in Dunkirk On one hand some believe that the occurrence in Dunkirk that took place was a great triumph for the /5(1).

''Some people have the view that the events at Dunkirk in deserve to be remembered as a triumph for Britain and its people. How far do your sources support or contradict this interpretation?'' I can't think of a way to set out my sources. The Battle of Dunkirk lasted from around May 25 to June 3, After the Phony War, the Battle of France began on 10 May, German armour burst through the Ardennes region and advanced rapidly driving north in the so-called “sickle cut”.

an explanation of the meaning of another's artistic or creative work; an elucidation: an interpretation of a poem. a conception of another's behavior: a charitable interpretation of his tactlessness. The different interpretations of the Dunkirk evacuation Both the German and British views are totally different.

They have come up with different interpretations of the Dunkirk evacuation. This will be discussed in this section. Why Do Historians Disagree?

History & The Arts. Featured content. Free courses. All content. Selection and interpretation of evidence.

Spinning Dunkirk

At the level of primary research and evidence, historians often find different evidence on the same subject. In some areas of historical inquiry new information causes new conclusions to be drawn and that.

Different interpretation of dunkirk
Rated 4/5 based on 42 review
Why Do Historians Disagree? - OpenLearn - Open University